A bad penny turns up

Thanks to Charon QC for pointing out a story that appeared in The Observer today: "Bruce Hyman was a barrister and an admired TV and radio producer. Then, inexplicably, he perverted the course of justice and now faces jail". Hyman admitted emailing a judgment he had forged to his client's former husband, who was seeking more contact with the couple's daughter. "Within minutes of doing so," says The Observer, "Hyman pounced, suggesting not only that the judgment was a forgery but that the father, who was representing himself, might have been responsible for faking it. The father suddenly found himself facing a charge of perverting the course of justice".

As Charon says, this is bizarre. What I wanted to comment upon though was the 'footnote' to the story. Apparently, the father was only able to get the police to take the case seriously after fathers' rights group Families Need Fathers put him in touch with 'a helpful police officer'. The Observer says that the father is now disillusioned with the courts system, and quotes him as saying: "Anyone who contemplates going through the family courts system should consider pulling their own fingernails out instead; it's less painful. Appearing at these private hearings, where parties and their lawyers too often seem to have the smearing of their opponents at the top of their agendas, robs you of your dignity and your belief in the system." Jim Parton of Families Need Fathers puts it more colourfully: "There's a lot of what I call "micro-shittiness" in the family courts," he says, "there are low-level acts of bullying by the lawyers in the corridors that go on all the time, but none of it gets reported." I'm sure some of this goes on, but my overwhelming experience of family lawyers has been quite the opposite. In almost all children cases that reach the courts there is a lot of mud-slinging between the parties, most of it exaggerated or irrelevant to the issues, and the lawyers work hard to cut through this to reach agreed arrangements, or at least to reduce the animosity, for the sake of the children.

Of course, there are exceptions, as Mr Hyman demonstrates, who do great damage to the good reputation that most family lawyers are striving so hard to build.


  1. John... I have just read the faked judgment. Extraordinary...

    This must surely be one of the more bizarre examples of strange behaviour by a lawyer?

  2. From what I have seen when clerking, I would agree with you...
    I have seen lawyers try over and over again to get couples to compromise on issues or struggle to quieten their own client when the emotions overtake them and the "mud-slinging" starts.

    I suppose not everyone can be like that though, and also, I have noticed that clients sometimes find the truth or the compromise very hard to take and might mistake this as bullying?


  3. Charon: Agreed. I can't recall anything like it from real life - it's as if Hyman was enacting some fictional character from a cheap novel.

    LL: Yes, it can sometimes be hard to guide your client on to the right lines, without them feeling that you're bullying them.


Post a comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment on this post. Constructive comments are always welcome, even if they do not coincide with my views! Please note, however, that comments will be removed or not published if I consider that:
* They are not relevant to the subject of this post; or
* They are (or are possibly) defamatory; or
* They breach court reporting rules; or
* They contain derogatory, abusive or threatening language; or
* They contain 'spam' advertisements (including links to any commercial websites).
Please also note that I am unable to give advice.