When I opened Resolution's monthly periodical The Review this morning, the usual wad of advertising leaflets from book publishers and seminar providers fell out, but there was also a No Fault Divorce Questionnaire from Resolution itself. This asks for the views of members upon no fault divorce, and particularly what should be required to show that the marriage had irretrievably broken down. This is boiled down to the following:
1. Is mutual consent sufficient, and if so, should this be only after a period of separation?
2. With no consent, is the filing of a 'statement of marital breakdown' by one party, followed by a period of time, sufficient and if so, what should the period be?
3. If 2 above, should there be any period of separation?
The purpose of the questionnaire is so that Resolution can formulate its policy, should reforming the ground for divorce find its way back on to the political agenda. I sincerely hope it does, as our current fault-based system is an unnecessary source of confrontation and is surely inappropriate in today's society.
[Incidentally, my answers were: 1. Yes to the first part, no to the second. 2. Yes, six months. 3. No.]