Friday, March 13, 2009

Cohabitation Bill

I have received the following News Release from Resolution:


Outdated laws on couples are creating a growing social problem, said Anthony Lester QC (Lord Lester of Herne Hill) the Lib Dem Life peer today. Speaking as his Cohabitation Bill is debated in the House of Lords, Lord Lester said that legal reform was urgently required to protect rapidly growing numbers of cohabitants, and their children, from falling into poverty.

“The face of family life has changed dramatically over the past three decades. Marriage rates are at their lowest since records began, one in four couples will be cohabiting in the near future, and cohabitation is increasingly seen as an alternative to marriage. Yet despite the widespread myth of ‘common law marriage’, couples who live together have virtually no legal protection,” said Lord Lester.

“This means that millions of people and their children are faced with poverty and hardship if relationships end. Our laws are completely out of step with modern family life. Reform is essential, as recommended two years ago by the Law Commission.”

Although cohabitation is the fastest growing family type in the UK, the lack of sufficient legal protection leaves many cohabitants reliant on government handouts and the support of family or friends when relationships break down.

“By the time I realised I had no rights, I was in too deep” said Lucy* who had two children with her ex partner. “I had sold my house and given up my job to support my ex by taking care of our children and helping out with his business. When I found out we were not common law husband and wife as I had assumed, I pressed for us to marry - to no avail. Since our split I have had to rely on government handouts and support from family whilst I try and rebuild my career and my new life as a single parent. I suppose the error I made was in trusting someone I loved”.

The reforms proposed in the Bill would have been a lifeline to Anna* whose partner left her in 2007

“My partner and I were engaged to be married”, said Anna, who was in a ten year relationship with her partner.

“We had been together a few years when he persuaded me to stop working so that I could look after him – he had a hugely successful career and I was earning much less than him, so it made sense to both of us. But after five years of not earning and looking after him and his house I was out in the cold when I discovered he was engaged to someone else. As soon as I eventually got work, my ex evicted me. The worst thing was, there was absolutely nothing I could do about it.”

The Cohabitation Bill is supported by Resolution, an association of over 5500 family solicitors.

Resolution’s David Allison said: “We know from experience that the most vulnerable cohabitants are those that have made career and financial sacrifices for the sake of their relationship. In a society concerned over the breakdown of the family and its potential to throw children into poverty, we should be supporting, not penalizing those who live in mutually supporting relationships and who make sacrifices for the future of their families”.

Lord Lester said that reform would be likely to save in court costs, state benefits and public housing, whereas the current situation means that the burden of providing for cohabitants on relationship breakdown is falling on the State.

“The Bill represents a new opportunity to deal effectively with this issue. I hope that the government and Parliament will give it their support so that it may become law before the General Election”.

*Names have been changed.

* * * * *

Further information about the Living Together Campaign can be found here.


  1. I'm against this, John. I think it's a terrible idea to restrict the freedom of couples to choose a completely no-strings relationship - it's because it's no-strings that it's popular! All this will do is encourage the rich to keep separate addresses and the poor unecessarily to live with their parents or in social housing.

    Well meaning, but wrong headed.

  2. Hi Carl. I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one.

    I'm not sure that many couples will decide to live separately if the Bill passes into law. The rights only arise if there are children or the couple have been together for two years, and there is an opt-out.

    I think the classic case where protection is required is where, say, the couple lived in the man's property, it was a long relationship and the woman stayed at home to bring up the children. At the end of such a relationship should she be left with nothing?


Thank you for taking the time to comment on this post. Constructive comments are always welcome, even if they do not coincide with my views! Please note, however, that comments will be removed or not published if I consider that:
* They are not relevant to the subject of this post; or
* They are (or are possibly) defamatory; or
* They breach court reporting rules; or
* They contain derogatory, abusive or threatening language; or
* They contain 'spam' advertisements (including links to any commercial websites).
Please also note that I am unable to give advice.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.