Time for a bit of joined-up thinking, perhaps?
Thursday, October 29, 2009
Inconsistent
Time for a bit of joined-up thinking, perhaps?
Labels:
Cohabitation
3 comments:
Thank you for taking the time to comment on this post. Constructive comments are always welcome, even if they do not coincide with my views! Please note, however, that comments will be removed or not published if I consider that:
* They are not relevant to the subject of this post; or
* They are (or are possibly) defamatory; or
* They breach court reporting rules; or
* They contain derogatory, abusive or threatening language; or
* They contain 'spam' advertisements (including links to any commercial websites).
Please also note that I am unable to give advice.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

Looks consistent to me. If someone leaves you, then they presumably don't want you to have their stuff. If, on the other hand, they're still living with you when they die, it's not unreasonable to suppose that they do.
ReplyDeleteLike that David. Agree with too.
ReplyDeleteHave already heard it elsewhere suggested by women to try to get partner to kill himself rather than divorce as widows are socially better regarded and financially better off than divorcees also.
Looks like we're heading for a society of eunuchs. Being sexual and having a partner is risky to your life.
More work for lawyers here though (suprise suprise), making wills, since people are voting with their feet on marriage and the co-habiting bits have to find the money elsewhere like in wills and prenups I suppose. No big deal I suppose. I will advise my children to stear clear of the 1973 mca and csa whatever else happens.
David: That assumes that it is and should be "their stuff". Often, they have accumulated "their stuff" partly through the efforts of their (former) partner, for example where they have been working and their partner has been looking after the home and bringing up the children.
ReplyDelete