Campaigns, criticisms and clerihews

I shall miss The Times' regular shots at the family justice system when it goes pay-to-view in June. The paper has, of course, long been running a campaign to open up the family courts (I wonder how many people will still be following their campaign after June?). Today the paper runs three stories, or perhaps that should be two stories and a commentary:

The first story concerns the criticisms of social workers in the recent EH v London Borough of Greenwich & Ors case (in which Lord Justice Wall said that social workers "are perceived by many as the arrogant and enthusiastic removers of children from their parents into an unsatisfactory care system"), and in a case involving Devon County Council, in which Lord Justice Aikens described the actions of social workers in Devon as “more like Stalin’s Russia or Mao’s China than the West of England”. The author of this story, Rosemary Bennett, then gives a brief commentary in which she suggests that we may have gone too far in suspecting child abuse, quoting fellow campaigner John Hemming MP who says that only 0.27 per cent of care applications are refused outright. Bennett suggests that the comments in the Greenwich and Devon cases may serve as a warning not just to social workers, but also to family court judges, who appear too ready to follow the views of social workers. The article concludes with the self-congratulatory: "Opening up the family courts, which followed a campaign by this newspaper, could help as their judgments are more open to scrutiny", and a warning that "further reforms may be needed".

In the second story Frances Gibb reminds us that Sir Nicholas Wall is, of course, to be sworn in today as the new President of the Family Division. This, she says, "may be a relatively low-key affair", but he "is unlikely in future to have a low profile to match", being "well-well known for his forthright pronouncements both in court and out of it". More importantly, however, Gibb tells us that when not in court Sir Nicholas enjoys collecting and restoring books and composing clerihews. Unfortunately, we are not given an example of his literary talent. However, says Gibb, in the immediate future he will have no time for such frivolities. Instead "he will be fighting the corner for the family courts: more funds; more disputes resolved out of court and no further opening up of the family courts — at least without full debate". Yes, those things should keep him busy...


  1. I can understand the criticism of social workers in EH, and I can understand and agree with the criticism of the first instance judge's failure to address the article 8 Convention right properly.

    I do worry a bit though about something Baron J said at para 64:

    In a case where the care plan leads to adoption the full expression of the terms of Article 8 must be explicit in judgment because, ultimately, there can be no greater interference with family life.

    That seems a bit too "tickboxy" to me. Cite article 8 in its entirety, and you're all right. Paraphrase it or analyse it fully without an extended quote, and you might be dodgy. Surely the approach should be both more qualitiative and more objective than that (i.e. did the judge and the care order comply with article 8, not did the judge think enough about article 8).

  2. I know what you mean. Sometimes the whole business of Human Rights can become something of a box-ticking exercise: "Article 2... check, Article 8... check, Article 12... check...".


Post a comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment on this post. Constructive comments are always welcome, even if they do not coincide with my views! Please note, however, that comments will be removed or not published if I consider that:
* They are not relevant to the subject of this post; or
* They are (or are possibly) defamatory; or
* They breach court reporting rules; or
* They contain derogatory, abusive or threatening language; or
* They contain 'spam' advertisements (including links to any commercial websites).
Please also note that I am unable to give advice.