Sunday, July 11, 2010

Child abuse, plain and simple

I read with rising anger a report in The Observer today that senior doctors are calling for male circumcision to be offered by the NHS, following an investigation into circumcisions at an Islamic school in Oxford, which found that 13 out of 32 boys who had the procedure ended up with medical problems. The article explains how the procedures were carried out and the nature of the medical problems that ensued, and goes on to say that this is not an isolated incident.

Male circumcision is also of course a Jewish practice, but they get away lightly in the article, which says that the Board of Deputies of British Jews 'reports no problems arising from the operations'. We are, however, told that most Jewish male circumcisions are carried out without anaesthetic by a "mohel", who is "very often" (but clearly not always) a qualified doctor.

It beggars belief that we are even discussing the use of this barbaric practice in a modern society. Strip away the ancient religious mumbo-jumbo nonsense and what you have is child abuse, plain and simple. To have children mutilated without their consent (often by charlatans and without anaesthetic) is so obviously wrong as to be unarguable, and hiding behind religion should make no difference.

2 comments:

  1. Bizarre. The Board of Deputies of British Jews 'describes circumcision, or brit milah in Hebrew, as "the primary symbol of Jewishness for men".'

    I have to admit I've never taken advantage of this indication to determine whether or not someone is a Jew - it's usually obvious in other ways. Not since prep school, anyway.

    Wasn't a similar argument produced to justify the legalisation of abortion?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, I don't see how it can be described as "the primary symbol of Jewishness for men" if Muslims men are also circumcised.

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for taking the time to comment on this post. Constructive comments are always welcome, even if they do not coincide with my views! Please note, however, that comments will be removed or not published if I consider that:
* They are not relevant to the subject of this post; or
* They are (or are possibly) defamatory; or
* They breach court reporting rules; or
* They contain derogatory, abusive or threatening language; or
* They contain 'spam' advertisements (including links to any commercial websites).
Please also note that I am unable to give advice.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.