Wednesday, November 03, 2010

Venal & Grabbit win contact case!

Yesterday Venal & Grabbit won a famous victory for their client by successfully opposing a father's application to have contact with his children.

Speaking outside court, Mr Venal said: "It just goes to show that you get what you pay for. The father's cheap solicitors were hopeless. We at Venal & Grabbit pride ourselves in providing a superior service for a superior fee."

The father was seen to leave the court in tears. "I've got no sympathy for him," said Mr Venal, "that's what happens when you don't instruct the best."

If you have problems with your ex wanting to have contact with your children then we at Venal & Grabbit have people who can help. Just call this number: 01234 666-666. (Note: if you need to ask what our charging rates are, then you probably can't afford us, sorry. Requests for legal aid will be met with laughter, followed by the phone being hung up.)


  1. Little bit too dry for me this John. Bit too close to the mark I'm affraid. 1st and 2nd times I read it I thought it was real. Third time I half got the (black) joke.

  2. You make an excellent point! Money can indeed buy you an excellent barrister, increasing significantly your chances of winning the case.
    As a litigant-in-person, in a 'leave to remove' case, I 'went a few rounds in the ring' with a top London barrister. Needless to say that Goliath gave David a right good battering! At stake, however, were the best interests of my children. The British judiciary saw fit to allow and encourage the legal case against overseas removal of the children to be prepared and presented by an emotionally-involved and legally-untrained lay-person (their father). Who else would relish such representation in court??? Upon appeal, I suggested to Sir Nicholas Wall that such an un-level playing field was surely not in the best interests of the children, and that they really deserved to have independent legal representation (as they do in New Zealand). Wall agreed, but refused my request because of a lack of finances from the MOJ. He did, however, say that I had a very good point and suggested that I take the matter to the ECHR, adding that this may help to improve the British system. I took his advice. The ECHR appeal is pending.
    Mr BD (LIP father in Re D (Children) [2010] EWCA Civ 50)


Thank you for taking the time to comment on this post. Constructive comments are always welcome, even if they do not coincide with my views! Please note, however, that comments will be removed or not published if I consider that:
* They are not relevant to the subject of this post; or
* They are (or are possibly) defamatory; or
* They breach court reporting rules; or
* They contain derogatory, abusive or threatening language; or
* They contain 'spam' advertisements (including links to any commercial websites).
Please also note that I am unable to give advice.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.