Friday Review: Not a lot going on
It's been a strangely quiet week, especially as far as reported cases go. There have been a couple of 'forum shopping' cases, in particular Jefferson v O'Connor, but not a lot else. Perhaps everyone is waiting for the President's transparency guidance to kick off next week, when just about every judgment will have to be published. Or something like that.
There have, however, been a few family law news items. For example, Resolution has said there is "no justification" for government plans to increase the court fee for a divorce from £410 to £750 (a statement of the bleeding obvious, given that the MoJ has admitted that the current fee is already "above cost price"), a report by the Tavistock Institute for the Department for Education has said that marriage guidance could save the country 'billions' by reducing family break-ups and, my favourite story, a millionaire could not understand why his ex-wife became "so aggressive" when he asked her to stay on in the marital home as a housekeeper for him and his new partner.
"For about the past four years now I have been indulging in that respected pass time [sic] of Arguing With People who are Wrong on the Internet." Says guest poster Sarah Phillimore on Pink Tape. Arguing with idiots on the internet, especially those from the 'corrupt family courts brigade' is, of course, an utterly futile 'pass time', hence I gave up doing it long ago. However, Sarah has learnt one thing from it, albeit an obvious thing: there is a need for information for families involved in the child protection system. Accordingly, says Phillimore, "we decided to create this resource", cunningly entitled the Child Protection Resource. I've had a look around the site and it's not clear who 'we' are (perhaps it's the Royal 'We'), but no doubt the site will be of great use.