Friday, August 21, 2015

Fickleness and folly


...were both in evidence in my posts this week on Marilyn Stowe’s Family Law & Divorce Blog, which included the following:

Further thoughts on enforcing family financial orders - With reference to The Law Society's response to the Law Commission's consultation.

A just and equitable child support variation - Upper Tribunal Judge Rowland gets back to basics in NT v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (CSM) (Child support : variation/departure directions: other).

The fickleness of legal fashion - Of transparency, and other passing legal fashions.

The folly of the litigant in person - As demonstrated in the case H v Dent & Ors.

Have a good weekend.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment on this post. Constructive comments are always welcome, even if they do not coincide with my views! Please note, however, that comments will be removed or not published if I consider that:
* They are not relevant to the subject of this post; or
* They are (or are possibly) defamatory; or
* They breach court reporting rules; or
* They contain derogatory, abusive or threatening language; or
* They contain 'spam' advertisements (including links to any commercial websites).
Please also note that I am unable to give advice.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.