Fickleness and folly


...were both in evidence in my posts this week on Marilyn Stowe’s Family Law & Divorce Blog, which included the following:

Further thoughts on enforcing family financial orders - With reference to The Law Society's response to the Law Commission's consultation.

A just and equitable child support variation - Upper Tribunal Judge Rowland gets back to basics in NT v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (CSM) (Child support : variation/departure directions: other).

The fickleness of legal fashion - Of transparency, and other passing legal fashions.

The folly of the litigant in person - As demonstrated in the case H v Dent & Ors.

Have a good weekend.

Comments