Friday, September 04, 2015

To have and have not - New by me on the Marilyn Stowe Blog

It's been a short week for me on Marilyn Stowe’s Family Law & Divorce Blog, where my posts have included:

Litigants in person face a minefield - As demonstrated by the case Re F (Children).

To have and have not in the family justice system - In stark contrast to the plight of litigants in person, we have the case Joy v Joy-Morancho and Ors.

Children to remain with grandparents despite mother being fit to care for them - The old, but only recently published, judgment in Re T (Children).

Have a good weekend.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment on this post. Constructive comments are always welcome, even if they do not coincide with my views! Please note, however, that comments will be removed or not published if I consider that:
* They are not relevant to the subject of this post; or
* They are (or are possibly) defamatory; or
* They breach court reporting rules; or
* They contain derogatory, abusive or threatening language; or
* They contain 'spam' advertisements (including links to any commercial websites).
Please also note that I am unable to give advice.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.