Monday, November 16, 2015

News Essentials: 16th November 2015


A brief summary of the essential family law news and cases from the last week:

NEWS
Court of Appeal rules on liability of councils for foster care abuse
The Court of Appeal has handed down a key ruling on the liability of councils for foster care abuse, concluding that local authorities do not owe a child in such care a non-delegable duty. Full story: Local Government Lawyer. See NA v Nottinghamshire County Council, below.

Domestic violence victims 'put at risk' by erratic handling of cases
HMIC says dangers to vulnerable witnesses not properly dealt with in a third of cases, including instances of racial abuse. Full story: The Guardian.

Care applications in October 2015
In October 2015, Cafcass received a total of 1,079 care applications.  This figure represents a 7% increase compared to those received in October 2014. Full story: Cafcass.

Cafcass private law demand
In October 2015, Cafcass received a total of 3,311 new private law cases.  This is a 2% decrease on October 2014 levels. Full story: Cafcass.

The Family Procedure (Amendment No. 3) Rules 2015
These Rules amend the Family Procedure Rules 2010. Statutory Instrument. For details, see here.

CASES
Ramadani v Ramadani [2015] EWCA Civ 1138 (12 November 2015)
Appeal considering the jurisdiction of a court in England and Wales to entertain an application for spousal maintenance in the context of the Maintenance Regulation following previous proceedings in another EU member state. Full report: Bailii.

NA v Nottingham County Council [2015] EWCA Civ 1139 (12 November 2015)
Appeal concerning liability of local authority for abuse suffered by child whilst in foster care. Full report: Bailii.

*      *      *

For more news, see here.

For more cases, see here.

To subscribe to the Family Lore Focus free weekly Newsletter, go here.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment on this post. Constructive comments are always welcome, even if they do not coincide with my views! Please note, however, that comments will be removed or not published if I consider that:
* They are not relevant to the subject of this post; or
* They are (or are possibly) defamatory; or
* They breach court reporting rules; or
* They contain derogatory, abusive or threatening language; or
* They contain 'spam' advertisements (including links to any commercial websites).
Please also note that I am unable to give advice.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.