Friday, February 05, 2016

Better debate on family law reform, and 3 children cases

This week on Marilyn Stowe’s Family Law & Divorce Blog I attempt to jettison scaremongering and prejudice from the debate on family law reform, before diving into the judgments of three very different children cases:

The end of the world as we know it - Raising the level of debate on family law reform.

Curtailing children litigation - Looking at something the President said in Q v Q (No 3).

Re C: A surprising state of affairs - The child relocation case Re C.

Re M: A sad and moving case - Looking at the care case Re M, which has also been in the news for other reasons.

Have a good weekend.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment on this post. Constructive comments are always welcome, even if they do not coincide with my views! Please note, however, that comments will be removed or not published if I consider that:
* They are not relevant to the subject of this post; or
* They are (or are possibly) defamatory; or
* They breach court reporting rules; or
* They contain derogatory, abusive or threatening language; or
* They contain 'spam' advertisements (including links to any commercial websites).
Please also note that I am unable to give advice.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.