Monday, May 16, 2016

News Essentials: 16th May 2016


A brief summary of the essential family law news and cases from the last week:

NEWS
President issues guidance on international family law
Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division, has issued guidance on family cases with an international aspect. Full story: Family Law.

Cafcass private law demand
In April 2016, Cafcass received a total of 3,557 new private law cases.  This is a 24% increase on April 2015 levels. Full story: Cafcass.

Care applications in April 2016
In April 2016, Cafcass received a total of 1,221 care applications.  This figure represents a 28% increase compared to those received in April 2015. Full story: Cafcass.

CoramBAAF expresses concern about use of Special Guardianship Orders
SGOs are too often made ‘without sufficient background checks’. Full story: Family Law Week.

CASES
PH v AH [2016] EWHC 1131 (Fam) (09 May 2016)
Application by a father for the return of his daughter to Poland. Full report: Bailii.

Local Authority X v HI & Ors [2016] EWHC 1123 (Fam) (12 May 2016)
Application by a Guardian for an order restraining a local authority from disclosing to the parents of a child in care a piece of information which that child has shared with professionals. Full report: Bailii.

X (Foreign Surrogacy: Child's Name), Re [2016] EWHC 1068 (Fam) (21 January 2016)
Application for a parental order in respect of child born following surrogacy arrangement in Nepal. Full report: Bailii.

*      *      *

For more news, see here.

For more cases, see here.

To subscribe to the Family Lore Focus free weekly Newsletter (which includes links to all of the week's top family law news stories, cases, articles and blog posts), go here.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment on this post. Constructive comments are always welcome, even if they do not coincide with my views! Please note, however, that comments will be removed or not published if I consider that:
* They are not relevant to the subject of this post; or
* They are (or are possibly) defamatory; or
* They breach court reporting rules; or
* They contain derogatory, abusive or threatening language; or
* They contain 'spam' advertisements (including links to any commercial websites).
Please also note that I am unable to give advice.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.