Monday, June 20, 2016

News Essentials: 20th June 2016

A brief summary of the essential family law news and cases from the last week:

Steep court fee rises are tax on justice, say MPs
Justice select committee condemns big rises in charges for divorce, employment or asylum cases as unjustified. Full story: The Guardian.

Mr Justice MacDonald reminds professionals of responsibilities when considering allegations by children
Actions of some professionals ‘materially prejudiced the welfare of both children’. Full story: Family Law Week. See AS v TH (False Allegations of Abuse).

Supreme Court to decide whether child must have ‘opportunity to be heard’ in disputed custody case
The Supreme Court will deliver its judgment in D (A Child) on Wednesday, 22 June. Full story: Family Law Week.

Hundreds of millions of maintenance owed to children is failing to be collected
A new report published today finds hundreds of millions of pounds of child maintenance arrears owed to children are failing to be collected by the government – with new debts piling up in the new system worth an average of £668 per family. Full story: Gingerbread.

Court of Protection: final Case Management Pilot Practice Direction
The attached pilot Practice Direction is published in advance of a case management pilot commencing in the Court of Protection. Full story: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary.

MoJ seeks views on domestic violence legal aid
The Ministry of Justice has begun a review of legal aid in domestic violence cases as part of efforts to gather data, giving solicitors just over two weeks to share their views. Full story: Law Society Gazette.

Munby: changes needed to encourage more children to give evidence in family court proceedings
The chief of the family court has said there has been a sea-change in attitudes to children giving evidence in court, but more changes are necessary. Full story: Community Care.

KB & RJ v RT [2016] EWHC 760 (Fam) (07 April 2016)
Surrogacy. Application for a parental order where the child was outside the jurisdiction. Full report: Bailii.

X, Y & Z, Re (Damages : Inordinate Delay in Issuing Proceedings) [2016] EWFC B44 (23 February 2016)
Application by mother for declarations and damages pursuant to the Human Rights Act following the two children being subject to a (purported) s.20 agreement to be accommodated by local authority when an interim care order was granted. Full report: Bailii.

R v R [2016] EWHC 1339 (Fam) (29 April 2016)
Application by father for summary return of children to Canada. Return ordered. Full report: Bailii.

*      *      *

For more news, see here.

For more cases, see here.

To subscribe to the Family Lore Focus free weekly Newsletter (which includes links to all of the week's top family law news stories, cases, articles and blog posts), go here.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment on this post. Constructive comments are always welcome, even if they do not coincide with my views! Please note, however, that comments will be removed or not published if I consider that:
* They are not relevant to the subject of this post; or
* They are (or are possibly) defamatory; or
* They breach court reporting rules; or
* They contain derogatory, abusive or threatening language; or
* They contain 'spam' advertisements (including links to any commercial websites).
Please also note that I am unable to give advice.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.