Thursday, October 13, 2016

Three cases, and a threat...


My posts this week on Marilyn Stowe’s Family Law & Divorce Blog included three cases with an important point to make, and an important point that I (and others) made:

Three year suspension of contact breaches father’s human rights - The ECHR case Moog v Germany.

Relocation case demonstrates conflict between requirement to obey the court and the welfare of children - Looking at the case X, Y and Z (Children) (Retrospective Leave to Remove from the Jurisdiction).

This anti-lawyer rhetoric threatens us all - The dangers of populist rhetoric.

Bankruptcy case has implications for financial remedy claims - Looking at the Court of Appeal's decision in Horton v Henry.

Have a good weekend.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment on this post. Constructive comments are always welcome, even if they do not coincide with my views! Please note, however, that comments will be removed or not published if I consider that:
* They are not relevant to the subject of this post; or
* They are (or are possibly) defamatory; or
* They breach court reporting rules; or
* They contain derogatory, abusive or threatening language; or
* They contain 'spam' advertisements (including links to any commercial websites).
Please also note that I am unable to give advice.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.