Monday, January 16, 2017

News Essentials: 16th January 2017

A brief summary of the essential family law news and cases from the last week:

Three-quarters of social workers oppose ‘power to innovate’ provisions
LAs should not be permitted to opt out of statutory duties to children and families. Full story: Family Law Week.

Sixteen new family law silks appointed
Sixteen family lawyers have been included among the new Queen's Counsel appointed today (12 January 2017). Full story: Family Law.

Civil partnership for only same-sex couples is ‘discriminatory’
Private members bill receives cross-party support ahead of Commons debate. Full story: Solicitors Journal.

Care applications in December 2016
In December 2016, Cafcass received a total of 1,068 care applications.  This figure represents a 3% decrease compared with those received in December 2015. Full story: Cafcass.

Cafcass private law demand
In December 2016, Cafcass received a total of 2,938 new private law cases. This is a 1% increase on December 2015 levels. Full story: Cafcass.

Foster carer left with no support for 6 years following dispute with local authority over placement
A family and friends foster carer who took on three vulnerable children after their mother was unable to care for them, failed to get council support for the arrangement for 6 years. Full story: Family Law.

MB v GK & Ors (No 2) Wardship (Welfare) [2017] EWHC 16 (Fam) (17 November 2016)
Wardship proceedings concerning 4 year old child currently living in Singapore in the care of his paternal grandparents. Full report: Bailii.

N (Deprivation of Liberty Challenge) [2016] EWCOP 47 (21 November 2016)
Deprivation of liberty challenge by man in his 40s under continuous supervision and control. Full report: Bailii.

*      *      *
For more news, see here.

For more cases, see here.

To subscribe to the Family Lore Focus free weekly Newsletter (which includes links to all of the week's top family law news stories, cases, articles and blog posts), go here.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment on this post. Constructive comments are always welcome, even if they do not coincide with my views! Please note, however, that comments will be removed or not published if I consider that:
* They are not relevant to the subject of this post; or
* They are (or are possibly) defamatory; or
* They breach court reporting rules; or
* They contain derogatory, abusive or threatening language; or
* They contain 'spam' advertisements (including links to any commercial websites).
Please also note that I am unable to give advice.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.