Friday, June 02, 2017

Three cases

My posts this (short) week on Marilyn Stowe’s Family Law & Divorce Blog included looking at three very different cases:

Northern Ireland case confirms futility of stealing documents - The case being Peacock v Peacock.

Privy Council clarifies rules to determine ownership of property - In Marr v Collie.

Another father complains to the ECHR of failure to enforce contact rights - In Onodi v Hungary.

Have a good weekend.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment on this post. Constructive comments are always welcome, even if they do not coincide with my views! Please note, however, that comments will be removed or not published if I consider that:
* They are not relevant to the subject of this post; or
* They are (or are possibly) defamatory; or
* They breach court reporting rules; or
* They contain derogatory, abusive or threatening language; or
* They contain 'spam' advertisements (including links to any commercial websites).
Please also note that I am unable to give advice.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.