Tuesday, August 29, 2017

News Essentials: 29th August 2017


A brief summary of the essential family law news and cases from the last week:

NEWS
No secure care place available for 'dangerous' teenager, UK judge told
Interim judgment sent to education secretary as search continues for secure accommodation for 14-year-old boy. Full story: The Guardian.

Brexit: Government wants continuing judicial relationship
A continuing formal reciprocal judicial relationship with the EU will be essential after March 2019, the government conceded today. Full story: Law Society Gazette.

Court approves £10k settlement over delays in providing sex education
The Court of Protection has approved a £10,000 damages settlement plus costs to a man with Down's Syndrome and an associated learning difficulty over delays in the provision of sex education. Full story: Local Government Lawyer. See CH v A Metropolitan Council, below.

New victim and witness rooms to improve court experience
Victims and witnesses will have their experience of going to court made easier through a number of new waiting rooms. Full story: Family Law.

Heterosexual couple take civil partnership case to Supreme Court
A heterosexual couple who want to enter a civil partnership instead of getting married have been granted the right to take their case to the Supreme Court. Full story: BBC News.

CASES
S (A Child) [2017] EWCA Civ 249 (24 February 2017)
Appeal by mother against care and placement orders in relation to 16 month old child. Appeal dismissed. Full report: Bailii.

M v F & SM (Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008) [2017] EWHC 2176 (Fam) (23 August 2017)
Application for parental order in relation to child born as a result of a gestational surrogacy arrangement between the applicant and her former partner, where the child was born to a surrogate mother. Wardship continued until law changed to permit applications for parental orders by a single applicant. Full report: Bailii.

CH v A Metropolitan Council [2017] EWCOP 12 (28 July 2017)
Application on behalf of claimant for approval of a proposed settlement of his claim for damages against Local Authority pursuant to HRA 1998. Full report: Bailii.

*      *      *
For more news, see here.

For more cases, see here.

To subscribe to the Family Lore Focus free weekly Newsletter (which includes links to all of the week's top family law news stories, cases, articles and blog posts), go here.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment on this post. Constructive comments are always welcome, even if they do not coincide with my views! Please note, however, that comments will be removed or not published if I consider that:
* They are not relevant to the subject of this post; or
* They are (or are possibly) defamatory; or
* They breach court reporting rules; or
* They contain derogatory, abusive or threatening language; or
* They contain 'spam' advertisements (including links to any commercial websites).
Please also note that I am unable to give advice.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.