Monday, September 04, 2017

News Essentials: 4th September 2017


A brief summary of the essential family law news and cases from the last week:

NEWS
Final Report on litigants who lack litigation capacity in Care proceedings published
Key recommendations published. Full story: Family Law Week.

Divorce ruling 'leaves law in state of flux'
Family lawyers predict a rise in the number of couples seeking prenuptial agreements after the Court of Appeal dismissed a woman's bid for an equal share of her and her ex-husband's assets. Full story: Law Society Gazette.

Munby P: Government support for LiPs ‘sadly inadequate’
Family court procedures and rules are unintelligible to litigants in person. Full story: Solicitors Journal.

Girl at centre of fostering row should live with grandmother, says judge
Judge Khatun Sapnara ends placement of five-year-old with Muslim family in case seized on by far-right activists. Full story: The Guardian. See report, below.

CASES
F (A Minor : secure accommodation resources) [2017] EWHC 2189 (Fam) (24 August 2017)
Judgment concerning the accommodation of a 14 year old boy with conduct disorder. Full report: Bailii.

The Child AB: Case Management Order – No. 7 [2017] EWFC B53 (30 August 2017)
Judgment in proceedings relating to placement of Christian child with Muslim foster parents. Full report: Bailii.

SR v NM [2017] EWHC 2187 (Fam) (11 August 2017)
Application for committal of father for failure to comply with contact order. Full report: Bailii.

*      *      *
For more news, see here.

For more cases, see here.

To subscribe to the Family Lore Focus free weekly Newsletter (which includes links to all of the week's top family law news stories, cases, articles and blog posts), go here.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment on this post. Constructive comments are always welcome, even if they do not coincide with my views! Please note, however, that comments will be removed or not published if I consider that:
* They are not relevant to the subject of this post; or
* They are (or are possibly) defamatory; or
* They breach court reporting rules; or
* They contain derogatory, abusive or threatening language; or
* They contain 'spam' advertisements (including links to any commercial websites).
Please also note that I am unable to give advice.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.