Cansford quality recognised
Cansford first became UKAS accredited in September 2012 and has since fulfilled the assessment
criteria year on year. Today, Cansford is accredited for the widest range of drugs tested in-house in
the UK. This year’s assessment has included the addition of UKAS’ LAB51 publication for
laboratories, such as Cansford, which performs analysis of toxicology samples in the UK, setting a
benchmark for consistency of approach across accredited labs.
LAB51 has been introduced in response to a review by UKAS into changes in the industry with
particular reference to analysis methodology, concerns over industry data integrity and a rapidly
changing environment due to technology advancements. It covers activities carried out by labs, such
as Cansford, which test for drugs and drug metabolites in blood, urine, hair, oral fluids and other
associated matrices for forensic, workplace, medical legal, or pathology (specialised toxicology)
services.
Says Kim Bagley, MD of Cansford Laboratories, “The accreditation shows our processes are robust
and would stand up in court if required. It is the only way a family law professional can be sure that
all the correct processes have been follow. It also gives our clients reassurance that we have solid
processes in place and shows our integrity as a testing laboratory.
“We welcome the addition of LAB51 and its customer-focussed requirements. It audits our quality
controls and proficiency, to ensure our results are valid, which is essential for the work we carry out.
Whilst it is not a legal requirement to be accredited, we take it extremely seriously and work
exceptionally hard to ensure we comply with the high standards that UKAS demands. We view this
as a measure of quality, and we wear our accreditation badge with great pride.”
All assessments from September 1st 2021 incorporate appraisal against the expectations of LAB51.
Comments
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to comment on this post. Constructive comments are always welcome, even if they do not coincide with my views! Please note, however, that comments will be removed or not published if I consider that:
* They are not relevant to the subject of this post; or
* They are (or are possibly) defamatory; or
* They breach court reporting rules; or
* They contain derogatory, abusive or threatening language; or
* They contain 'spam' advertisements (including links to any commercial websites).
Please also note that I am unable to give advice.