Friday, July 07, 2017

The old and the new


My posts this week on the Marilyn Stowe’s Family Law & Divorce Blog included something of the old, and something of the new:

A novel way to deal with a party frustrating an order for sale - The latest judgment in the saga that is Welch v Welch.

When both parents are their child’s worst enemy - As in the 2011 case T v S (Wardship).

Why do some fathers think they shouldn’t pay child maintenance? - Some possible answers to the four billion pound question.

Father required to return children to Spain four years after abduction - The 2009 case LAB v KB (Abduction: Brussels II Revised).

Have a good weekend.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment on this post. Constructive comments are always welcome, even if they do not coincide with my views! Please note, however, that comments will be removed or not published if I consider that:
* They are not relevant to the subject of this post; or
* They are (or are possibly) defamatory; or
* They breach court reporting rules; or
* They contain derogatory, abusive or threatening language; or
* They contain 'spam' advertisements (including links to any commercial websites).
Please also note that I am unable to give advice.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.