Skip to main content


Featured post

Wither to or not: Acting for both parties - a good idea, or a recipe for disaster?

Legal Futuresreports that 'leading private client firm' Withers has launched a new service for couples wanting an amicable separation without instructing separate lawyers. As Legal Futures points out, this is not the first such service, and I understand that at least one other firm is planning to introduce something similar.

I realise that law firms are keen to find new revenue streams, but is this a good idea, or a recipe for disaster?

To an old-timer like me the whole idea of acting for two parties in a divorce or separation is anathema. After all, the SRA Code of Conduct (paragraph 6.2) is clear enough: You do not act in relation to a matter or a particular aspect of it if you have a conflict of interest (i.e. where your separate duties to act in the best interests of two or more clients in relation to the same or a related matters conflict) or a significant risk of such a conflict in relation to that matter or aspect of it.

Surely, that is the end of the matter? Isn't …

Latest posts


Internet Newsletter for Lawyers March/April 2020

News Essentials: 28th March 2020

Husband who failed to pay LSPO not allowed to continue with appeal

Action for Children responds to today's child poverty stats

Children’s charity frontline workers warn families fear ‘going under’ during coronavirus outbreak

News Essentials: 21st March 2020

Co-parenting through Coronavirus: new service for worried parents

News Essentials : 14th March 2020

Family Rights Group advice service secures £350,000 from Department for Education